Add more bike types, like "Single-Speed" and "Track Bike"

Request to expand on Bike types available in the "Gear" section of Account Settings on Strava.

Requests include:

-Track Bike

-Single Speed

-Hipster Bike

-Commute Bike

-Unicycle

 

To vote for filtered Segment Leaderboard results by bike type, go here.

339

评论

198 条评论
  • E-bike should be a distinct activity, as in "Bike", "Run", "E-bike", rather than a different bicycle type.  That way E-bikers get their own leaderboards for segments and don't get their results included with human-only powered bikers.

    Instead of or in addition to adding more bicycle types, users ought to have the option of specifying their own bicycle type and providing the common constants used in the power calculation such as CdA (coefficient of drag X area), Crr (coefficient of rolling resistance), etc.  This would allow users with unusual bicycle types (e.g recumbent HPVs, velomobiles, faired bikes) to get more accurate power and energy calculations.

    8
    评论操作 固定链接
  • I'd add Single speed as option for Road, Mtn and CX bikes

    Ability to filter using bike types would be very cool on the segment pages. Then you can better compare "apples to apples" so to speak

    6
    评论操作 固定链接
  • E-bike is required as well because it is very unfair comparing my commute with non-assisted bikes. Thanks
    6
    评论操作 固定链接
  • it would be possible to compute the cadence too, if you are able to save your gear inches (or gear ratio) of your single-speed/track bike.

    4
    评论操作 固定链接
  • I use a Trek 7.2 FX for my daily commute to work.  Commuter Hybrid should be one of the choices.

    4
    评论操作 固定链接
  • If leaderboards can be filtered by bike type, then simply adding an "ebike" bike type would be sufficient.  (I didn't see that request before I wrote the above comment.)

    3
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Please add Track Bike, a lot of people train in velodromes!

    3
    评论操作 固定链接
  • jeesh! - where does it stop? carbon vs steel?  There are so many bike variations, somehow Strava would have to come to a sensible rationalised selection.  I can see the sense of filtering the broad categories, but where would it end if they include all the niche rides? Bamboo trike recumbents with yellow flags and loaded panniers...?

    I only ride fixed and accept that I top out in terms of cadence on some segments, but I'm happy to compare with geared bikes on KOMs.  That said, I think it should be one of the broad categories.

    So, as a short list for the 'Broad Categories', how about (in no particular order):

    BMX/Freestyle

    Unicycle

    Folding commuter

    Road

    Road - SS/fixed (contentious pairing!)

    Road - tandem

    Road - tourer

    Road - recumbent

    MTB - no-suss

    MTB - hard-tail

    MTB - full-suss

    MTB - SS/fixed

    MTB - tandem

    3
    评论操作 固定链接
  • How about a recumbent as a second road bike?

    2
    评论操作 固定链接
  • I'd like to see fatbikes on the bike type list please...

    2
    评论操作 固定链接
  • IMO, the fact that this request has been outstanding for so many years shows that Strava is NOT listening to its users. This and several other missing features is exactly why I cancelled my recent paid membership trial. I am getting my money's worth for free but that's it.

    2
    评论操作 固定链接
  • I can't believe this post has been here since 2012 and they still haven't done anything about it. Come on, Strava! 

    2
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Would rather have the ability to view all the actual bikes used and a sub cat for type so I can compare times on my different bikes from one page.
    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Why do you need Segments on your E-Bike? If I held on to a car up a climb I would not brag about it or compare it to other peoples' rides.  You should make all your E-rides private. "It is very unfair comparing my commute with non-assisted bikes", I agree.  " It requires a great deal of human effort to show near the top of the leaderboard on a popular segment", are you trying to get KOMs on you E-bike? If so why?  Isn't the point of and E-bike to not require a great deal of human effort?  If you are going to put in the effort, do it on a real bike.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Mountain biking should be a stand alone activity type.  Bike should be changed to Road Biking and Mountain Biking should be added.  That way, if you go for a road ride on your SS, you can select Road Biking + SS, and conversely if you go MTBing you can select that + your MTB.  Road biking and MTBing are very different activities and should be separated.  

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Another request!  20-inchers! (à la bmx/freestyle, which is what i train on)

    And I'll second the request for unicycles as long as Strava promises not to start recording number of times falling down.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • I would love to have Unicycling included as a distinct activity.  I use Strava exclusively to track my progress doing mountain unicycling on a nearby switchback descent trail.  My descent times (13 - 16 minutes) are being compared to a mountain bike (5-6 minutes), so the leaderboard is a bit meaningless.

    Regarding the falling that Max mentioned, I've tried to standardize my runs by repeating any section on which I fall.  Having to backtrack for 10-20 feet, remount, and re-attempt acts as a time penalty on the overall descent time.  It might be hard to even determine when a fall has occurred from 1 Hz GPS data, particularly given the GPS errors in some of the ride locations.

    Elle indicated that she would need to see a relatively large number of unicycle requests from the Strava community before adding it as an activity type.  It seems there are quite a few unicyclists logging times on Strava - now we just need to coordinate a 'feature request' campaign.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • For mountain bikes, suspension is a substantial differentiator for downhill speed and occasionally for very rough flat or uphill segments.

    To justify this as not being a pedantic request, I suggest 3 broad categories of no suspension, front suspension and full suspension. For downhill sections riders would expect to see substantial differences in times between these three sub-categories. I would assume that other categories of bike would not have suspension, or that this wouldn't enhance performance on the road.

     

    Also +1 to the single speed / fixie request above. This makes a huge difference on fast sections and on sustained climbs.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • I would contest that SS/Fixed are not the same.  Continuous pedaling on a fixed drivetrain is much different than singlespeed or typical drivetrains.  

    Inputting your gear inches would also allow strava to generate very accurate cadence.  

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • There definitely needs to be a definition between bike types road/mountain. (but with mountain, I'd really like to see a definition between hard-tail bikes and full-suspension), would be great to see how your times compared to other bikes of a similar style.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Add a penny farthing category.  I have over 2000km on mine and have had to fit it under road.  This throws off my road numbers juuuuust a little.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Would be nice to see kickbike/footbike/scooter as a category as I have to upload my kickbike activities as a ride and it is closer to running than riding but the speed is faster and I would take out a lot of runners KOM's (heart rate and kj output is similar to running)

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • While parsing bike types can get insane, I would like a "track" or "fixed gear" filter/setting to better compare my riding to others on my route.  Like many people I'm an urban rider on a fixed gear bike.  With 46x17 gearing I can never approach 25 mph average speeds.  tnx.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • There are just too many kinds of bikes to fairly represent each one as a classification. Moreover, the classifications are constantly evolving. What I'd like to see is simply the ability to click on somebody's bike and see the details of their gear. I like entering the information about my gear, retiring components, entering new ones, etc. But as far as I can tell, it is currently a private thing. I would like to share it.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • I'd just be happy about a category "other".  I wanted to record what I do on my folder, and differentiate that from my road bike, so it's showing up as a MTB.  I'd rather leave type blank.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • I am ok with adding things like track bike, cyclocross bike, cruiser, etc. Things that are completely different bicycles. But you people saying you should add options to put things like full sus, hardtail, carbon, steel, 10 speed, pennyfarthing, tire widths or whatever, is kind of stupid and ridiculous. That is where the little description box is handy, if you really feel the need to let people know whether your carbon pennyfarthing has a suspension fork or not. I saw also the people saying "we need the categories like full suspension so I can have a leaderboard for my fat arse so I can get some self esteem boost!!" Which is just stupid. Thats like if in a mtb race there were different categories on what size frame, wheel, and how much suspension you have. Cycling is not about people's gear being fair to eachother. The "bond" between how much money one person has or what sponsors they have etc etc is all a part of the sport, and howgood you are at it.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Differing wheel sizes and gearings, and thus the effect on power, would be awesome.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Support for "fatbikes" (like the Surly Pugsley and Salsa Mukluk) would be very nice to see.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Nice thread, great comments.  I too support the ability to add information about  the bike you are riding to assist in power calcs (sprockets/gear inches, or some other measurement as per Sheldon Brown).

     

    I do a lot of interval training and use my fixie for strength.  At times I accelerate from zero up to 50kph on my 68" over a short distance.  I know this takes a lot of power (my legs tell me so), but Strava doesn't pick this up as it has no idea of the gear I am using.  I suspect it thinks that I am constantly changing up.  Doing this kind of exercise under controlled conditions I generate over 1000W.  Strava is lucky if it tells me I generate above 300W.

     

    So, I'm a +1 for a way to input the bike cassette/chainring/wheel size settings and for Strava to calculate power using this.

    1
    评论操作 固定链接
  • Certainly some classifications would be useful.  Unicycles are fine, but certainly recumbents are far more prevalent.  In the "standard" bikes, clearly subgroups like UCI legal road racing bike, Triathlon bike, TT bike, ect. would be helpful to racers.  For the recreational cyclists, certainly a heavy beach cruiser is much different than a TT bike or a tandem.  MTB's certainly need their own group!  Since, I'm mostly a recumbent rider, I'd like to see sub groups like trikes, long wheel base, short wheel base high racer, mid racer, low racer, faired two wheelers (Lighting F40 and such), faired three wheelers (Velomobiles) and streamliners (HPV land speed record machines).  I would certainly encourage Strava to add general groups and sub groups under that for those that want to be picky about comparisons.  But as it stands now, Strava does not want me on any leaderboards (climbing, distance, speed, etc) because I normally ride a recumbent.  I'm sorry, but this is discriminatory! 

    1
    评论操作 固定链接

请先登录再写评论。

没有找到您要找的?

新建帖子